Why Buying Added Years Benefited Teachers

In this blog, I’ll explain the advantages of buying “added years” of service within the Teachers’ Pension Scheme and why this option was particularly beneficial for teachers looking to enhance their retirement benefits. I will also delve into the unfortunate reality of many teachers being steered away from this valuable scheme toward alternative arrangements that may not have been in their best interest. This blog is available in both text and video form and I hope you find it helpful and informative.

What Does Buying “Added Years” Mean?

The concept of buying added years within the Teachers’ Pension Scheme allowed members to purchase additional years of pensionable service. This option was invaluable for teachers as it provided enhancements to their pension and other benefits.

Enhanced Pension Income

First and foremost, buying added years increased the number of years of pensionable service used to calculate retirement benefits.

Most teachers do not accumulate enough years through natural service alone, given the time spent studying before starting their careers.

A 40-year career is typically needed to achieve maximum benefits. Teachers who joined the scheme in their mid-twenties, for instance, could purchase the missing years to ensure maximum benefits at retirement.

Early Retirement Options

Another significant advantage was the option for early retirement. Added years allowed teachers to build up an unreduced pension by purchasing extra years of service, making early retirement more financially feasible.

Flexibility in Retirement Planning

The scheme also offered considerable flexibility. Teachers could decide at various career stages how many added years they wished to purchase. For example, a young teacher starting out might only afford one or two extra years, while a senior teacher could purchase more as their salary increased.

Tax Efficiency

Contributions made to purchase added years were often tax-deductible, providing substantial tax benefits, especially for higher-rate taxpayers. This made the added years option even more attractive because it allowed for higher rates of tax relief to be granted at source, eliminating the need for claims through HMRC.

Protection for Family Members

The Teachers’ Pension Scheme included benefits for dependants such as widows, widowers, and children. Buying added years increased pensionable service, thereby enhancing the financial security of family members in the event of the teacher’s death.

“Through buying extra years of service, teachers can increase the financial security of family members in the unfortunate event of death.”

Alternative Arrangements: The Downside

Despite the many benefits, many teachers were advised not to purchase added years. Instead, they were steered towards Free-Standing Additional Voluntary Contribution (FSAVC) pension plans, which are investment-based products.

Higher Risks and No Guarantees

Unlike the added years option, FSAVCs come with no guarantees. Poor investment decisions and performance can lead to a reduced retirement fund. In contrast, the benefits from the Teachers’ Pension Scheme, including added years, are based on length of service and salary – there is no investment risk involved.

Mis-Selling of FSAVCs

You might wonder why financial advisors and insurance company salesmen would recommend FSAVCs over added years. In short, it was self-interest that drove these recommendations, mainly due to the high profits and commissions from selling FSAVCs. As a result, over a million FSAVC policies were sold, predominantly to public sector professionals.

Identifying Mis-Selling

Common signs of mis-selling include:

Lack of Fair Advice: Not being advised on the pros and cons of all available options.
Limited Choices: Being told that an FSAVC was the only option.
Poor Risk Explanation: Not having the investment risks fully explained.
Hidden Charges: Not being informed about all the charges that would impact the FSAVC plan performance.

What To Do If You Were Mis-Sold an FSAVC

If you suspect you were mis-sold an FSAVC, it’s crucial to know that it is never too late to address this issue and seek compensation. Even if you’re already in retirement, you can still prove mis-selling and be compensated accordingly.

Seeking Compensation

Compensation aims to put you back in the position you would have been in had you taken the better option of paying extra into the Teachers’ Pension Scheme. Don’t worry if this happened years ago; original sales paperwork often remains in the seller’s archives. As long as you can remember the name of the company administering your FSAVC policy, an investigation can take place, and compensation can be sought.

First Steps to Take

Think about the FSAVC plan: Recall the name of the company that administered your FSAVC policy.
Gather information: Have a look for any documentation you might have retained.
Seek Expert Advice: Please do reach out for free, no obligation advice.

Conclusion

If you suspect that you are a victim of FSAVC mis-selling, you are not alone. Many people have been in a similar position and have successfully challenged the advice they were given and received compensation. It’s vital to seek advice to address the impact of mis-selling on your retirement savings.

I set up Greg Vaughan Financial Services and Pension Claims with the sole aim of helping people resolve these issues. Feel free to get in touch for a free, no-obligation assessment of your FSAVC sale.

I hope you found this blog post helpful and informative. If you think you’re a victim of mis-selling or just have further questions, you can contact me anytime.

Find out more: FSAVC mis-selling pension plans

View our highest and average claims against some of these FSAVC providers

If you're worried about your own investments and think you could benefit from expert advice, then I'm here to help.

Contact Greg Vaughan Financial Services

Please feel free to use the Contact Form, send an email or telephone.

Email: greg@pension-claims.com

Phone: Call Greg on 0151 329 0775 or 07788 630037

Our highest and average claims against the following FSAVC providers